State v. Cardenas’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 109 Wash. 2d 207 - State v. Dunaway · 106 Wash. 2d 514 - State v. Nordby · 109 Wash. 2d 947 - Allingham v. City of Seattle · 106 Wash. 2d 547 - State v. Armstrong · 117 Wash. 2d 211 - State v. Grewe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“intended to drive in an area where he knew, or should have known, there would be vulnerable pedestrians.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cardenas“knew or should have known that the victim ... was particularly vulnerable....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cardenas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.