77 Wash. App. 119 - State v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 88 Wash. 2d 221 - State v. Wanrow · 87 Wash. 2d 374 - State v. Arndt · 93 Wash. 2d 186 - State v. Stephens · 124 Wash. 2d 702 - State v. Ortega-Martinez · 106 Wash. 2d 443 - Smith v. King
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“■ Here, the jury had before it the question of how the crime was committed, as well as the question of whether it was committed. In order to determine that, the jury must necessarily have determined who the victim was. Stephens , at 190. Mr. Lee had a right to know whether it was the Red Cross, Ms. Dominguez, or both, and he had a right to a unanimous verdict on the question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.