77 Wash. App. 339 - State v. Drew’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1999
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 68 Wash. App. 610 - State v. Kisor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he facts of this case fall squarely within the common sense meaning of `crime against a person.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Barnett“[r]esearch has not disclosed a definition of `crime against a person' in the criminal statutes,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Barnett“`[c]rime against children or other persons'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Barnett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.