Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 77 Wash. App. 636 - State v. Warness

77 Wash. App. 636 - State v. Warness’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
12
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently May 2015 · most notably State v. Appleby (2009), Howard v. State (1997)

31 state decisions — followed in 12 states

200199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Davis v. United States · Stansbury v. California · McNeil v. Wisconsin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The need for Miranda protection does not exist except in a custodial interrogation situation. The right cannot be invoked before it exists”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.