77 Wash. App. 678 - State v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. Bouknight · 79 Wash. 2d 12 - State Ex Rel. Carroll v. Junker · Williams v. Kemp · 121 Wash. 2d 552 - Hanson v. City of Snohomish · 77 Wash. 2d 616 - Maynard Inv. Co., Inc. v. McCann
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“render an advisory opinion on a record which has yet to be completed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Nason · State v. Nason“The sentencing guidelines and prosecuting standards apply equally to offenders in all parts of the state, without discrimination as to any element that does not relate to the crime or the previous record of the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Osman“must not enter into the selection of the appropriate sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Osman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.