77 Wash. App. 929 - State v. Tunney’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 117 Wash. 2d 93 - State v. Kjorsvik · 118 Wash. 2d 151 - State v. Hopper · 67 Wash. App. 824 - State v. Allen · 72 Wash. App. 407 - State v. Wallway · 70 Wash. App. 778 - State v. Belleman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under the rules of punctuation, appositives which serve a nonrestrictive (parenthetic) function are set off by commas; appositives which serve a restrictive (necessary) function are not.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[I]t is implicit that assault is a knowing, intentional act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tamalini
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.