Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 77 Wis. 2d 225 - State v. Evans

77 Wis. 2d 225 - State v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
14
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 69 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably 81 Wis. 2d 376 - State Ex Rel. Flowers v. Department of Health & Social Services (1978), United States v. Bazzano (1983)

8 federal appellate · 69 state decisions — followed in 14 states

27019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griffin v. California · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Kastigar v. United States · Baxter v. Palmigiano · Garrity v. State of New Jersey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n order to guarantee the fifth amendment rights of a probationer or a parolee and at the same time to preserve the integrity of the probation system”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[S]tatements or the fruits of statements made by a probationer to his probation agent or in a probation revocation hearing in response to questions which, as here, are the result of pending charges or accusations of particular criminal activity, may not be used to incriminate the probationer in a subsequent criminal proceeding.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The state may, however, compel a person's testimony if he is protected by a grant of immunity that renders the compelled testimony inadmissible against the witness in a criminal prosecution.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.