Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 770 F.2d 103 - Armco Inc at Fmc

Armco Inc at Fmc’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
December 1998
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on La Buy v. Howes Leather Co. · 103 S. Ct. 247 - Beneficial Finance of Kansas, Inc. v. United States · 309 F. Supp. 354 - Biechele v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. · 387 F. Supp. 324 - Costello v. Wainwright · Liptak v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Courts have tended to read Rule 53 narrowly, closely circumscribing the range of circumstances in which reference to a master is appropriate.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7417, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,299 United States of America Muckleshoot Tribe Nooksack Upper Skagit Squaxin Island Lummi Indian Tribe Makah Tribe Tulalip Tribe Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Quileute Indian Tribe Puyallup Tribe Hoh Indian Tribe Suquamish Tribe Quinault Indian Nation Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation Nisqually Indian Tribe Jamestown Tribe Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Port Gamble Bands Skokoish Tribe Sauk-Suiattle Tribe Stillaguamish Tribe v. State of Washington, United States of America Muckleshoot Tribe Nooksack Upper Skagit Squaxin Island Lummi Indian Tribe Makah Tribe Tulalip Tribe Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Puyallup Tribe Quileute Indian Tribe Suquamish Tribe Hoh Indian Tribe Quinault Indian Nation Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation Nisqually Indian Tribe Jamestown Tribe Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Port Gamble Bands Skokoish Tribe Sauk-Suiattle Tribe Stillaguamish Tribe v. State of Washington, and 26 Upland and Tideland Private Property Owners, (Dan Buehler, Robert L. Davis, Bruce I. Fielding, Arthur J. Gerdes, Joe Hoots, Keith C. Huetson, Commander J.C. James, Richard Sayre Koch, Elaine C. Lefler, Joan Lemonds-Roush, John S. Lewis, Steven L. No. 96-35082 D.C. No. Cv-89-00003-Er Luke, Edward R. McMillan Robert F. Newman, Mark A. Nysether, Arthur I. Price, Ray D. Randall, Cynthia Ramussen, Robert G. Shanks, Axel Strakeljahn, Leana Tracy, Stuart W. Turner, George B. Usnick, Lee S. Vincent, Joan Walker and William E. Whitney, Jr.), Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants. United States of America, Muckleshoot Tribe Nooksack Upper Skagit Squaxin Island Lummi Indian Tribe Makah Tribe Tulalip Tribe Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Puyallup Tribe Quileute Indian Tribe Suquamish Tribe Hoh Indian Tribe Quinault Indian Nation Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation Nisqually Indian Tribe Jamestown Tribe Lower Elwha Klallamtribe Port Gamble Bands Skokoish Tribe Sauk-Suiattletribe Stillaguamish Tribe v. State of Washington, and James Hadley James Carter Ann Carter Charmond Adkins Larry Alexander Shirlee Alexander Grace Boyd Pierce Davis Rosemary Duncan May Davis James C. Johnston Sarah Johnston W.K. Kirch Jo Ann Kirch David Mitchell Louis Nawrot, Jr. Boon Ho Woo Harold Bauer Billie Bauer William Chase Frances Fellows George Grader Earl Hunsperger Millicent Hunsperger Edward Krenz Eleanor Krenz H.J. Merrick Moss Gordon Margaret Moss Sewall Reynolds Emma Reynolds John Riach Alva Hazel Robb Irene Smith Providence Worley, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants. United States of America, and Lummi Tribe Muckleshoot Tribe Nooksack Upper Skagit Squaxin Island Makah Tribe Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Tulalip Tribe Puyallup Tribe Quileute Indian Tribe Hoh Indian Tribe Suquamish Tribe Nisqually Indian Tribe Jamestown Tribe Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Port Gamble Bands Skokoish Tribe Sauk-Suiattle Tribe Stillaguamish Tribe, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants, and Quinault Indian Nation Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation, Plaintiffs-Intervenors v. State of Washington, United States of America, and Muckleshoot Tribe Nooksack Upper Skagit Squaxin Island Lummi Indian Tribe Makah Tribe Tulalip Tribe Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Puyallup Tribe Quileute Indian Tribe Hoh Indian Tribe Suquamish Tribe Quinault Indian Nation Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation Nisqually Indian Tribe Jamestown Tribe Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Port Gamble Bands Skokoish Tribe Sauk-Suiattle Tribe Stillaguamish Tribe, Plaintiffs-Intervenors v. State of Washington, United States of America, and Lummi Indian Tribe Muckleshoot Tribe Nooksack Upper Skagit Squaxin Island Makah Tribe Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Tulalip Tribe Puyallup Tribe Quileute Indian Tribe Hoh Indian Tribe Suquamish Tribe Quinault Indian Nation Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation Nisqually Indian Tribe Jamestown Tribe Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Port Gamble Bands Skokoish Tribe Sauk-Suiattle Tribe Stillaguamish Tribe, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees v. State of Washington, and Puget Sound Shellfish Growers, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants · United States of America Muckleshoot Tribe Nooksack Upper Skagit Squaxin Island Lummi Indian Tribe Makah Tribe Tulalip Tribe Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Quileute Indian Tribe Puyallup Tribe Hoh Indian Tribe Suquamish Tribe Quinault Indian Nation Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation Nisqually Indian Tribe Jamestown Tribe Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Port Gamble Bands Skokoish Tribe Sauk-Suiattle Tribe Stillaguamish Tribe v. State of Washington, United States of America Muckleshoot Tribe Nooksack Upper Skagit Squaxin Island Lummi Indian Tribe Makah Tribe Tulalip Tribe Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Puyallup Tribe Quileute Indian Tribe Suquamish Tribe Hoh Indian Tribe Quinault Indian Nation Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation Nisqually Indian Tribe Jamestown Tribe Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Port Gamble Bands Skokoish Tribe Sauk-Suiattle Tribe Stillaguamish Tribe v. State of Washington, and 26 Upland and Tideland Private Property Owners, (Dan Buehler, Robert L. Davis, Bruce I. Fielding, Arthur J. Gerdes, Joe Hoots, Keith C. Huetson, Commander J.C. James, Richard Sayre Koch, Elaine C. Lefler, Joan Lemonds-Roush, John S. Lewis, Steven L. Luke, Edward R. McMillan Robert F. Newman, Mark A. Nysether, Arthur I. Price, Ray D. Randall, Cynthia Ramussen, Robert G. Shanks, Axel Strakeljahn, Leana Tracy, Stuart W. Turner, George B. Usnick, Lee S. Vincent, Joan Walker and William E. Whitney, Jr.), Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants. United States of America, Muckleshoot Tribe Nooksack Upper Skagit Squaxin Island Lummi Indian Tribe Makah Tribe Tulalip Tribe Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Puyallup Tribe Quileute Indian Tribe Suquamish Tribe Hoh Indian Tribe Quinault Indian Nation Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation Nisqually Indian Tribe Jamestown Tribe Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Port Gamble Bands Skokoish Tribe Sauk-Suiattle Tribe Stillaguamish Tribe v. State of Washington, and James Hadley James Carter Ann Carter Charmond Adkins Larry Alexander Shirlee Alexander Grace Boyd Pierce Davis Rosemary Duncan May Davis James C. Johnston Sarah Johnston W.K. Kirch Jo Ann Kirch David Mitchell Louis Nawrot, Jr. Boon Ho Woo Harold Bauer Billie Bauer William Chase Frances Fellows George Grader Earl Hunsperger Millicent Hunsperger Edward Krenz Eleanor Krenz H.J. Merrick Moss Gordon Margaret Moss Sewall Reynolds Emma Reynolds John Riach Alva Hazel Robb Irene Smith Providence Worley, Defendants-Intervenors- United States of America, and Lummi Tribe Muckleshoot Tribe Nooksack Upper Skagit Squaxin Island Makah Tribe Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Tulalip Tribe Puyallup Tribe Quileute Indian Tribe Hoh Indian Tribe Suquamish Tribe Nisqually Indian Tribe Jamestown Tribe Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Port Gamble Bands Skokoish Tribe Sauk-Suiattle Tribe Stillaguamish Tribe, Plaintiffs-Intervenors- and Quinault Indian Nation Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation, Plaintiffs-Intervenors v. State of Washington, United States of America, and Muckleshoot Tribe Nooksack Upper Skagit Squaxin Island Lummi Indian Tribe Makah Tribe Tulalip Tribe Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Puyallup Tribe Quileute Indian Tribe Hoh Indian Tribe Suquamish Tribe Quinault Indian Nation Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation Nisqually Indian Tribe Jamestown Tribe Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Port Gamble Bands Skokoish Tribe Sauk-Suiattle Tribe Stillaguamish Tribe, Plaintiffs-Intervenors v. State of Washington, United States of America, and Lummi Indian Tribe Muckleshoot Tribe Nooksack Upper Skagit Squaxin Island Makah Tribe Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Tulalip Tribe Puyallup Tribe Quileute Indian Tribe Hoh Indian Tribe Suquamish Tribe Quinault Indian Nation Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation Nisqually Indian Tribe Jamestown Tribe Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Port Gamble Bands Skokoish Tribe Sauk-Suiattle Tribe Stillaguamish Tribe, Plaintiffs-Intervenors v. State of Washington, and Puget Sound Shellfish Growers, Defendants-Intervenors
  2. “We believe that the district court erred in granting the master authority to preside at trial on the merits of this case. We also believe, however, that the district court acted properly in granting the master the broad authority to supervise and conduct pretrial matters, including discovery activity, the production and arrangement of exhibits and stipulations of fact, the power to hear motions for summary judgment or dismissal and to make recommendations with respect thereto. If the district court determines that liability rests with some or all of the parties, it may request the master to conduct evidentiary rehearings with respect to damages and alternative relief and make recommendations with respect to these matters. It may also direct the magistrate to monitor and supervise any injunctive relief granted and to make reports to it with respect to compliance with any decrees entered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.