Hastings v. Judicial Conference of United States’s Empirical Analysis
770 F.2d 1093 · 1985
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 20 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently May 2015 · most notably Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Catholic University of America (1996), Gubiensio-Ortiz v. Kanahele (1988)
27 federal appellate · 20 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 331 · 28 U.S.C. § 332 · 28 U.S.C. § 372 · 2 U.S.C. § 437D (§ 307 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971) · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)
Relies on Younger v. Harris · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Buckley v. Valeo · Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority · Withrow v. Larkin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“all orders and determinations, including denials of petitions for review, shall be final and conclusive and shall not be judicially reviewable on appeal or otherwise.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“to investigate the facts and allegations contained in the complaint.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“conduct an investigation as extensive as it considers necessary,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.