United States v. Daniels’s Empirical Analysis
770 F.2d 1111 · 1985
Citation profile
76 federal appellate · 11 district · 31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 136 later decisions — most recently January 2023 · most notably United States v. North (1990), United States v. Lewis (1986)
76 federal appellate · 11 district · 31 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on Cupp v. Naughten · Krulewitch v. United States · Patterson v. United States · Spencer v. State of Texas a Bell · Michelson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 136 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[t]he exclusion of other crimes evidence is not simply a”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“that there is 'a high risk of undue prejudice whenever, as in this case, joinder of counts allows evidence of other crimes to be introduced in a trial of charges with respect to which the evidence would otherwise be inadmissible.'”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“If it appears that a defendant . is prejudiced by a joinder of offenses ... in an indictment ... or by such joinder for trial together, the court may order an election or separate trial of counts, ... or grant whatever other relief justice requires.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.