Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 770 F.2d 1536 - Pollgreen v. Morris

Pollgreen v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis

770 F.2d 1536 · 1985

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently January 2013 · most notably Fedaa al Najjar Mazen al Najjar v. John Ashcroft Attorney General US Department of Justice (2001), Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Division (1987)

22 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

1901985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 8 U.S.C. § 1321 (§ 271 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1323 (§ 273 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (§ 274 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Camp v. Pitts · United States v. Bailey · Desist v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2) hold unlawful and set aside agency action, findings and conclusions found to be— (A) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Hopefully a system can be devised so that (i) a composite hearing with respect to common issues can be held while allowing (ii) facts peculiar to each vessel owner to be independently ascertained and determined with (iii) a single appeal with appropriate subparts to this Court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[o]ur review . . . is limited to the record compiled before the agency.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.