Green v. McKaskle’s Empirical Analysis
770 F.2d 445 · 1985
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2018
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 332
Relies on Hutto v. Finney · Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. · Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co. · Ruiz v. Estelle · Ruiz v. Estelle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he individual class member should be barred from pursuing his own individual lawsuit that seeks equitable relief within the subject matter of the class action.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.