Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 770 F.2d 676 - Jeffries v. Chicago Transit Authority

Jeffries v. Chicago Transit Authority’s Empirical Analysis

770 F.2d 676 · 1985

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably United States v. Koon (1994), 52 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1358, 43 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,231 Ana Leon T. v. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Richard Surel Frank Calloway and Dorothy Hardy (1987)

32 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

2601985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · Holmberg v. Armbrecht · Mohasco Corp. v. Silver · Coastal Steel Corp. v. Wheelabrator-Frye, Inc. · Occidental Life Insurance Company of California v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an absolute right to await termination of EEOC proceedings”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Laches will bar this claim only if [plaintiff] had inexcusably delayed in asserting it and [defendant] has been materially prejudiced by the delay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “failure to file his Title VII claim until completion of the EEOC process [is] not inexcusable delay and cannot support the application of laches.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.