Schmidt v. Skolas’s Empirical Analysis
770 F.3d 241 · 2014
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 17 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Phillips v. County of Allegheny · In re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation · Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries Inc Ct · Watterson v. Page · Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & Berman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To decide a motion to dismiss, courts generally consider only the allegations contained in the complaint, exhibits attached to the complaint and matters of public record.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if 'the pleading does not reveal when the limitations period began to run,' then 'the statute of limitations cannot justify Rule 12 dismissal.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] complaint does not fad to state a claim simply because it omits facts that would defeat a statute of limitations defense.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.