United States v. Dodd’s Empirical Analysis
770 F.3d 306 · 2014
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 2024
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments) · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Gall v. United States · Lewis Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Casey · Stinson v. United States · United States v. Allen · United States v. Stephenson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the application turns on a question of fact, the clear error standard applies; if it turns on a legal interpretation, de novo review is appropriate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.