Casey v. Toyota Motor Engineering Manufacturing North America, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
770 F.3d 322 · 2014
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Pool v. Ford Motor Co. · American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. Grinnell · Ford Motor Co. v. Ridgway · Leverette v. Louisville Ladder Co. · General Motors Corp. v. Sanchez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the product was defectively designed so as to render it unreasonably dangerous; (2) a safer alternative design existed; and (3) the defect was a producing cause of the injury for which the plaintiff seeks recovery.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“must show the safety benefits from [the] proposed design are foreseeably greater than the resulting costs, including any diminished usefulness or diminished safety.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“would have prevented or significantly reduced the risk of the claimant's personal injury ... without substantially impairing the product's utility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.