Campbell v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
770 F.3d 540 · 2014
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2243 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Santobello v. New York · Puckett v. United States · Lockyer Attorney General of California v. Andrade · Harrington v. Richter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of [his sentencing] would have been different.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.