United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
770 F.3d 628 · 2014
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1957 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 982 (§ 1366 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 853 (§ 413 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1320A (§ 1128b of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Lane v. Pena Secretary of Transportation · Libretti v. United States · United States v. Mezzanatto · United States v. Goodapple · United States v. Dortch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.