Romulus v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
770 F.3d 67 · 2014
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 10 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 28 U.S.C. § 1453 (§ 5 of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams · Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation · Whitaker v. American Telecasting, Inc. · Meridian Security Insurance v. Sadowski · 133 S. Ct. 1345 - Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Knowles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“after receipt by the defendant, through service or otherwise, of a copy of an amended pleading, motion, order or other paper from which it may first be ascertained that the case is one which is or has become removable.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“If the case as stated by the initial pleading is removable, Section 1446(b)(1) requires the defendant to remove within thirty days of its receipt. Section 1446(b)(3) requires the defendant to remove within thirty days of receiving a subsequent paper form which it may first be ascertained that the class action is or has become removable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We do not address the complicated questions concerning the possibility of removal outside of the specified CAFA statutory procedures.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.