Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 770 F.3d 978 - Kerin v. Titeflex Corp.

Kerin v. Titeflex Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

770 F.3d 978 · 2014

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
February 2025
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc · Whitmore v. Arkansas · Summers v. Earth Island Institute

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The existence of standing is a legal question, which we review de novo.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “three elements: injury in fact, traceability, and redressability.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “When reviewing a pre- discovery grant of a motion to dismiss for lack of standing, we accept as true all well-pleaded fact[s] . . . and indulge all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff[s'] favor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.