Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 770 F. Supp. 103 - Williams v. James

770 F. Supp. 103 - Williams v. James’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
January 1994
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2243 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Evitts v. Lucey · Jones v. Cunningham · Copeland v. United States · Billiteri v. United States Board of Parole

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.