770 F. Supp. 2d 434 - Waters v. KREAM’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692E (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692F (Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on Clomon v. Jackson · Russell v. Equifax A.R.S. · Gammon v. GC Services Ltd. Partnership · Avila v. Rubin · United States v. National Financial Services, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Violation of Tcpa is an automatic violation of the Mgl 93A [sic].”) . See, e.g., Waters v. Kream, 770 F.Supp.2d 434, 437 (D.Mass.2011) (“The Chapter 93A claims were predicated on the putative violations of the FDCPA. Since there was no underlying violation of the latter, there was no unfair or deceptive act or practice in violation of the former.”); Pimental v. Wachovia Mortg. Corp., 411 F.Supp.2d 32 (D.Mass.2006) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] representation from a debt collector is deceptive when it can be reasonably read to have two or more different meanings, one of which is inaccurate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“any false representation or deceptive means to collect or attempt to collect any debt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.