770 F. Supp. 2d 579 - LAYZER v. Leavitt’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 301 (Animal Drug Amendments of 1968) · 42 U.S.C. § 1301 (§ 1101 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395 (§ 1801 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395W (§ 1860d-1 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395W (§ 1860d-2 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396R (§ 1927 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 801 (Truth in Regulating Act of 2000)
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Bennett v. Spear · United States v. Mead Corp. · American Tobacco Co. v. Patterson · Henrietta v. Bloomberg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(A) a drug that may be dispensed only upon a prescription and that is described in subparagraph (A)(i), (A)(ii), or (A)(iii) of section 1396r-8(k)(2) of this title; 15 or (B) a biological product ... or insulin [and insulin products] ... and such term includes a vaccine licensed under [ 42 U.S.C. § 262 ] and any use of a covered part D drug for a medically accepted indication ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.