Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 770 N.E.2d 332 - Mapp v. State

Mapp v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Menna v. New York · Negron v. United States · Griffith v. United States · Tumulty v. State · Murray v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Plea bargaining is a tool used by both prosecutors and defendants to expedite the trial process. Defendants waive a whole panoply of rights by voluntarily pleading guilty. These include the right to a jury trial, the right against self-incrimination, the right of appeal, and the right to attack collaterally one's plea based on double jeopardy.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “appears to reflect a misunderstanding of” Menna v. N.Y., 423 U.S. 61, 62 , 96 S.Ct. 241 , 46 L.Ed.2d 195 (1975),”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.