Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 770 N.E.2d 338 - State v. Davis

State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2010
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Leon · Jaggers v. State · Newby v. State · Cutter v. State · State v. Eichholtz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the State appeals the trial court’s grant of the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence, the State is appealing from a negative judgment. Consequently, the State has the burden of demonstrating to us that the evidence is without conflict and that the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom lead to the conclusion opposite that reached by the trial court. During our review, we consider only the evidence most favorable to the judgment, and we neither reweigh the evidence nor judge the credibility of the witnesses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.