Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 124 Wash. 2d 57 - State v. Johnson · Fugate v. State · Bacher v. State · In re Wright · Archer v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“trial court is not obligated to identify the aggravators that support consecutive sentences separately from the factors that support the sentence enhancement”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Merely asserting bias and prejudice does not make it so. The law presumes that a judge is unbiased and unprejudiced.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“must establish from the judge's conduct actual bias or prejudice that places the defendant in jeopardy.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Perry v. State · Tharpe v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.