Cohoon v. Cohoon’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Faherty v. Faherty · 176 Ind. App. 211 - Haycraft v. Haycraft · Straub v. B.M.T. Ex Rel. Todd · Pettit v. Pettit · Meehan v. Meehan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the provision in the parties Agreement which states that child support, custody, or visitation issues shall be resolved by 'binding arbitration' is void as against public policy in that the agreement attempts to usurp the continuing jurisdiction of the Court over the issues concerning child support modifications, contempt actions, custody, and visitation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cohoon v. Cohoon“[nljothing in the 'dissolution order indicates that Father was entitled to a 100% abatement of his weekly support obligation during his extended periods of visitation with M.C.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Whited v. Whited“whether a party is in contempt of the [divorce decree] is not encompassed within the binding arbitration provision of the [settlement agreement]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cohoon v. Cohoon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.