Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 770 P.2d 1022 - Monroc, Inc. v. Sidwell

Monroc, Inc. v. Sidwell’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 2005
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 207

Relies on Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Armour & Co. v. Wantock · State v. Walker · Von Hake v. Thomas · Dumas v. King

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he jury or the [district] court . . . shall also assess the damages resulting to the plaintiff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.