People v. Juarez’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2014
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rakas v. Illinois · Ybarra v. Illinois · United States v. Percival · People v. Hearty · 507 So. 2d 558 - Korreckt v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Whether an asserted expectation of privacy is 'legitimate' depends on objective factors, not on the individual's subjective expec tations. [The supreme court has] repeatedly emphasized that the existence of such an expectation can only 'be determined after examining all the facts and circumstances in each particular case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“and, after the entry and search began, he stated that he did not live there. We disagree. 110 Before a defendant can challenge the constitutionality of a search, he or she must establish that he or she has standing, which is”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the person seeking to challenge the legality of a search ... was himself the 'vietim' of the search or seizure”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Jorlantin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.