Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 770 P.2d 137 - State v. Stilling

State v. Stilling’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently October 2022

17 state decisions

6019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Griffith v. Kentucky · United States v. Mauro · Allied Structural Steel Co. v. Spannaus · Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[wle decided Long on neither federal nor state constitutional principles, but rather as a ~ result of our supervisory capacity over the lower courts”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Any person who has been twice convicted, sentenced, and committed for felony offenses at least one of which offenses having been at least a felony of the second degree or a crime which, if committed within this state would have been a capital felony, felony of the first degree or felony of second degree, and was committed to any prison may, upon conviction of at least a felony of the second degree committed in this state, other than murder in the first or second degree, be determined as a habitual criminal and be imprisoned in the state prison for from five years to life.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Given the great weight jurors are likely to give eyewitness testimony, and the deep and generally unperceived flaws in it, to convict a defendant on such evidence without advising the jury of the factors that should be considered in evaluating it could well deny the defendant due process of law under article I, section 7 of the Utah Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.