Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 770 P2D 878 - Silver v. Slusher

Silver v. Slusher’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

92
cited by 92 later decisions
4
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 2 district · 61 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc. (1999), Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc. (1992)

12 federal appellate · 2 district · 61 state decisions

51019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Conley v. Gibson · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · 10 Cal. App. 3d 376 - Fletcher v. Western National Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The common law, as modified by constitutional and statutory law, judicial decisions and the condition and wants of the people, shall remain in force in aid of the general statutes of Oklahoma....”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “An action for fraud may not be predicated on false statements when the allegedly defrauded party could have ascertained the truth with reasonable diligence.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"... If, on a motion asserting the defense numbered 6 of this subsection to dismiss for failure of the pleading to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, matters outside the pleading are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment and all parties shall be given reasonable opportunity to present all material made pertinent to such a motion by the rules for summary judgment....””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.