Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 660 So. 2d 961 - Hiter v. State · 585 So. 2d 753 - Reynolds v. State · Wright v. State · Marshall v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where an affidavit is overwhelmingly belied by unimpeachable documentary evidence in the record[-]such as, for example, a transcript or written statements of the affiant to the contrary[-]to the extent that the court can conclude that the affidavit is a sham[,] no hearing is required.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.