Bullock v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sorrell v. State · Miller v. State · Hance v. Georgia · 30 Ala. App. 304 - Moore v. State · 475 So. 2d 609 - Ex Parte Bell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“' Andrews v. State , 370 So.2d 320 , 321 (Ala. Crim. App.), cert denied , 370 So.2d 323 (Ala. 1979), citing Miller v. State , 290 Ala. 248 , 275 So.2d 675 (1973). The evidence corroborating the accomplice's testimony and connecting the defendant to the offense can be purely circumstantial evidence. Mathis v. State , 414 So.2d 151 (Ala. Crim. App. 1982). But,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Bosner v. State · Bosner v. State“Ex parte Bell , 475 So.2d 609 , 613 (Ala.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1038 , 106 S.Ct. 607 , 88 L.Ed. 2d 585 (1985).'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Bosner v. State · Bosner v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.