770 So. 2d 1158 - Mann v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Ake v. Oklahoma · 490 So. 2d 927 - Maxwell v. Wainwright · 759 So. 2d 650 - Thompson v. State · Cherry v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Ake requires that a defendant have access to a `competent psychiatrist who will conduct an appropriate examination and assist in evaluation, preparation, and presentation of the defense.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The record reveals that Carbonel [Mann's confidential mental health expert] performed an extensive evaluation of Mann that included neuropsychological testing based on his history of serious alcohol and substance abuse and his history of head injury. Carbonel testified that, in addition to interviewing Mann, she reviewed numerous documents including affidavits from family members, Mann's childhood health records, records from correctional institutions, hospital records, and expert testimony from prior proceedings. Carbonel also testified that she did a lengthy psychological evaluation of Mann and conducted various tests including a Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) and a Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale test, among others. Based on this evaluation, Carbonel was able to testify to the existence of the two statutory mental mitigators. The record demonstrates that Mann's expert performed all the essential tasks required by Ake . Thus, Mann's request for an evidentiary hearing was properly denied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“must accept the defendant's factual allegations as true to the extent they are not rebutted by the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.