¶1We affirm the issues raised in Willie Slaughter’s appeal of his convictions for sexual battery and escape. See Miller v. State, 667 So.2d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); and see State v. Ramsey, 475 So.2d 671 (Fla.1985). Howéver, as for the issue raised by the state on cross-appeal, the trial court’s holding that the Prison Re-leasee Reoffender Act (“Act”) is unconstitutional is erroneous and is reversed. See State v. Cotton, 769 So.2d 345 (Fla.2000). The cause is remanded for a determination as to whether appellant qualifies for sentencing under the Act. See State v. Cole*1252man, 761 So.2d 323 (Fla.2000); State v. Young, 766 So.2d 425 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).
¶2AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.