¶1ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
¶2We grant rehearing en bane for the purpose of receding from B.T. v. State, 702 So.2d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), to the extent that B.T. is inconsistent with our decision in this case.
770 So. 2d 164
L.D. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 28, 2000
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-06-28
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2016
4 state decisions
Relies on B.T. v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2000-06-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →