Young v. Neumann

¶1Elton Young filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging the trial court’s denial of his motion for release on bond in his prosecution for robbery with a firearm.

¶2Petitioner is charged with an offense for which there is no automatic right to release on bond if the state established that the proof of his guilt was evident or the presumption great.1See Art. 1, Section 14, Fla. Const.; Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.131(a); State v. Arthur, 390 So.2d 717 (Fla.1980). Here, the state has failed to make the requisite showing, based on the probable cause affidavit alone, that the proof was evident or the presumption of guilt great as to robbery with a firearm. See also State ex rel. Van Eeghen v. Williams, 87 So.2d 45 (Fla.1956); Kirkland v. Fortune, 661 So.2d 395 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); State v. Perry, 605 So.2d 94, 97 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 613 So.2d 9 (Fla.1992).

¶3We grant this petition for writ of habeas corpus and remand to the trial court with direction that the court consider pretrial release under rule 3.131, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure, or, upon proper motion by the state, pretrial detention under rule 3.132, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure and Section 907.041, Florida Statutes (1999).

¶4PETITION GRANTED; CAUSE REMANDED.