770 So. 2d 29 - State v. Lipscomb’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “The officer stopped the defendant and patted him down, detecting a cylinder-like item in the defendant's pocket, which turned out to be a crack pipe. This court held that the seizure of the crack pipe was not justified under the”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Howard

2. “the State failed to show that the crack pipe [seized from respondent's pocket] was discovered pursuant to the `plain feel' exception recognized in Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366 , 113 S.Ct. 2130 , 124 L.Ed.2d 334 (1993).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 807 So. 2d 218 - State v. Lipscomb

3. “[n]othing in Officer Hughes's testimony explains that his `tactile discovery' of the `cylinder-like item' led him to conclude that it was either a weapon on contraband,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 807 So. 2d 218 - State v. Lipscomb