Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

770 S.W.2d 362

State v. Guy

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1989

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1989-03-30

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1998

4 state decisions

Relies on State v. Williams · State v. Hyzer

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-03-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PREWITT, Acting Presiding Judge.

¶1I respectfully dissent.

¶2I believe that at least venireman Gammill and probably veniremen Dalton and Chandler should have been excused for cause as they indicated a fixed partiality toward testimony of police officers. Cf. State v. Williams, 643 S.W.2d 832 (Mo.App.1982). See also State v. Hyzer, 729 S.W.2d 576, 579 (Mo.App.1987). I do not believe that the trial court’s inquiries established that the veniremen could be impartial.

/770/sw2d/362 · .json · Public domain