Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 771 F.2d 1168 - Deck v. Leftridge

Deck v. Leftridge’s Empirical Analysis

771 F.2d 1168 · 1985

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably Myers v. Morris (1987), Madewell v. Roberts (1990)

7 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions

1101985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Polk County v. Dodson · Kirchberg v. Feenstra · Tower v. Glover · White v. Bloom · Smith v. Bacon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “allegations of a conspiracy must be pleaded with sufficient specificity and factual support to suggest a `meeting of the minds.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he factual basis need not be extensive, but it must be enough to avoid a finding that the suit is frivolous. [Citation omitted.] (Plaintiffs) must at least allege that “the defendants had directed themselves toward an unconstitutional action by virtue of a mutual understanding,” and provide some facts “suggesting such a ‘meeting of the minds.’ ” [Citation omitted.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.