Andrews v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
771 F.2d 184 · 1985
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently September 2001 · most notably Ordower v. Feldman (1987), Kagan v. Caterpillar Tractor Co. (1986)
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 7 U.S.C. § 6B
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. · M/s Bremen v. Zapata off-Shore Company · Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. Tomanio · International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[ojn motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or a party’s legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for ... (6) any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Because the federal statutes giving rise to Andrews' claim contain no express statute of limitations, federal courts must borrow the applicable statute from analogous state law, which in Illinois is the three-year period contained in the Illinois securities laws.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The borrowing of a state statute of limitations includes the state's tolling doctrines, which suspend the application of the statute of limitations in prescribed situations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.