Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 771 F.2d 44 - Rosenthal & Rosenthal Inc. v. New York State Urban Development Corp.

Rosenthal & Rosenthal Inc. v. New York State Urban Development Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

771 F.2d 44 · 1985

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
May 2008
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 2008

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

70198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Berman v. Parker · Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff · Thompson v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp. · Georgia v. City of Chattanooga · Albert Hanson Lumber Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “rationally related to a conceivable public purpose,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.