Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 771 F.2d 856 - Oliney v. Gardner

Oliney v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis

771 F.2d 856 · 1985

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
June 2023
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Brenda Curtis Alvin Williamson v. Citibank Na Citicorp North America Inc Citicorp Securities (2000), Finch v. Hughes Aircraft Co. (1991)

10 federal appellate · 2 district ·

10019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1653

Relies on B.D. International Discount Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. · Strawbridge v. Curtiss · Strawbridge v. Curtiss · Field v. Volkswagenwerk AG · Pressroom Unions-printers League Income Security Fund v. Continental Assurance Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a plaintiff files a second complaint alleging the same cause of action as a prior, pending, related action, the second complaint may be dismissed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “no right to maintain two separate actions involving the same subject matter at the same time in the same court and against the same defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “by filing, and failing to inform the court or opposing counsel of a second identical suit while the first suit was still pending.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.