Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 771 F.2d 916 - Gates v. Spinks

Gates v. Spinks’s Empirical Analysis

771 F.2d 916 · 1985

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
April 2001
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2001 · most notably Owens v. Okure (1989), Meade v. Grubbs (1988)

30 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

600198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Wilson v. Garcia · Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. · Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. Tomanio · Burnett v. Grattan · Garcia v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[m]ost 1983 actions are predicated on intentional rather than negligent acts. Also ... 1983 was enacted for the purpose of redressing injuries from intentional misconduct. It follows that the 1983 action is more analogous to intentional torts governed by ... Miss.Code Ann. 15-1-35.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “assault, assault and battery, maiming, false imprisonment, malicious arrest, or menace, and all actions for slanderous words concerning the person or title, and for libels,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a]ll actions for which no other period of limitation is prescribed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.