Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 771 F.3d 113 - Cuomo v. Crane Co.

Cuomo v. Crane Co.’s Empirical Analysis

771 F.3d 113 · 2014

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
August 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1442

Relies on Singleton v. Wulff · Boyle v. United Technologies Corp. · Willingham v. Morgan · Jefferson County v. Acker · Osborn v. Haley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Liability for design defects in military equipment cannot be imposed, pursuant to state law, when (1) the United States approved reasonably precise specifications; (2) the equipment conformed to those specifications; and (3) the supplier warned the United States about the dangers in the use of the equipment that were known to the supplier but not to the United States.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.