Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 771 F.3d 118 - Chau v. Lewis

Chau v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

771 F.3d 118 · 2014

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc. · Rinaldi v. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc. · James v. Gannett Co. · Krumme v. WestPoint Stevens Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Pure opinion is a statement of opinion which is accompanied by a recitation of the facts upon which it is based .... ” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); Koly v. Enney, 269 Fed.Appx. 861, 865 (11th Cir.2008) (per curiam) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) a written defamatory factual statement [of and] concerning the plaintiff; (2) publication to a third party; (3) fault; (4) falsity of the defamatory statement; and (5) special damages or per se actionability.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'assume that New York law controls, and such implied consent is sufficient to establish choice of law.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.