Chau v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis
771 F.3d 118 · 2014
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc. · Rinaldi v. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc. · James v. Gannett Co. · Krumme v. WestPoint Stevens Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Pure opinion is a statement of opinion which is accompanied by a recitation of the facts upon which it is based .... ” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); Koly v. Enney, 269 Fed.Appx. 861, 865 (11th Cir.2008) (per curiam) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Turner v. Wells“(1) a written defamatory factual statement [of and] concerning the plaintiff; (2) publication to a third party; (3) fault; (4) falsity of the defamatory statement; and (5) special damages or per se actionability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'assume that New York law controls, and such implied consent is sufficient to establish choice of law.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.