Versata Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Certainly this simplification factor weighs more strongly in favor of a stay . when all of the litigated claims are undergoing CBM review. But there can still be a simplification of the issues when only some, but not all, of the claims asserted in the litigation are challenged in a CBM review. In a situation like this one, a proper simplification analysis would look to what would be resolved by a CBM review versus what would remain. The review of every claim of each of Versata’s asserted patents leaves little doubt that issues will be simplified.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 67 F. Supp. 3d 555 - Protegrity Corp. v. Epicor Software Corp.

2. “[t]his is not to say ... that the grant of a CBM petition on a subset of asserted claims automatically simplifies the issues. By its very nature, the CBM process will always simplify some issues.” Id. at 1372, n. 3. . In addition, plaintiff expresses concern that granting a stay will”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 67 F. Supp. 3d 555 - Protegrity Corp. v. Epicor Software Corp.