Hurst v. Beck’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Hishon v. King & Spalding · Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company · United Transportation Union v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority · Delli Paoli v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an equitable award for a reasonable future period required for the victim to reestablish her rightful place in the job market_ [Citations omitted.]_ Like back pay, front pay serves to make the victim of discrimination whole and restore the economic position that [she] would have enjoyed but for the employer’s unlawful conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.