Soler v. McHenry’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
January 1997
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1920
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Powers v. Ohio · Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co. · Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. August
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not reflect an intent to exclude blacks from the jury. His explanation is related to facts of this specific case and not some class-based characteristic or group affiliation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Soler v. Waite“Soler objected, suggesting that Motton was excluded solely because of her race. The court overruled Soler's objection, and impaneled the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Soler v. Waite“had a substantial connection to Soler's case. None of the depositions were patently unreasonable or unnecessary to the litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Soler v. Waite
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.