Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 771 P.2d 664 - Pickhover v. Smith's Management Corp.

Pickhover v. Smith's Management Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
6
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 2015

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 13 state decisions

1901989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 464 So. 2d 552 - Vetrick v. Hollander · 182 Ind. App. 350 - South Tippecanoe School Building Corp. v. Shambaugh & Son, Inc. · Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical Contractors · 17 Utah 2d 255 - Union Pacific Railroad v. El Paso Natural Gas Co. · Bartlett v. Davis Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An agreement to insure is an agreement to provide both parties with the benefits of insurance. Individuals understand that insurance will protect them against the consequences of their own negligence and more than likely assume that if one ... agrees as part of his or its [contractual] duties to provide insurance, that the insurance will protect both of them regardless of the cause of the loss.... If that were not their intent, each would provide his or its own protection....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “An agreement to provide insurance merely allocates an economic burden on one party to make a payment to protect another after the parties have ultimately decided `to shift the risk of loss * * * upon an insurer.' * * * An agreement to purchase insurance does not make the party agreeing to provide the insurance an indemnitor. Rather, an agreement to insure is an agreement to provide both parties with the benefits of insurance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “an agreement to provide insurance for another's benefit, while analogous in some respects to an agreement to indemnify another for the consequences of its own negligence, is not subject to the strict construction rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.